f9cfd6ce5b
Use the type RefName for all the needed places and fix pull mirror sync bugs ( #24634 )
...
This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the
code more maintainable.
Fix #15367
Replaces #23070
It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune
origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed.
We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git
remote update origin` to do the sync.
Some answer from ChatGPT as ref.
> If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected,
there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check:
>
>Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your
system. You can check the version by running git --version in your
terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if
that resolves the issue.
>
>Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the
remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config
--get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes
+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git
config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*".
>
>Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the
remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags
origin to list all the tags on the remote repository.
>
>Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags
on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the
git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete
local tags using the git tag -d command.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-05-26 01:04:48 +00:00
d92909fa8b
Treat PRs with agit flow as fork PRs when triggering actions. ( #23884 )
...
There is no fork concept in agit flow, anyone with read permission can
push `refs/for/<target-branch>/<topic-branch>` to the repo. So we should
treat it as a fork pull request because it may be from an untrusted
user.
2023-04-06 16:57:30 -04:00
964a057a76
Fix checks for `needs` in Actions ( #23789 )
...
Fix:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/77
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/81
Before:
<img width="1489" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/228501567-f752cf87-a7ed-42c6-8f3d-ba741795c1fe.png ">
Highlights:
- Upgrade act to make things doable, related to
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/32
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/33
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/35
- Make `needs` works
- Sort jobs in the original order in the workflow files
2023-03-30 22:33:17 +08:00
023e61e678
Create commit status when event is `pull_request_sync` ( #23683 )
...
Fix : #23674
If the type of `hook_event` is `pull_request_sync`, also need to insert
a record of `commit_status` into DB.
Because `pull_request` event and `pull_request_sync` event have the same
payload, so the code is reusable.
Screenshot:
2023-03-24 16:05:48 -04:00
5eea61dbc8
Fix missing commit status in PR which from forked repo ( #23351 )
...
close : #23347
### Reference and Inference
According to Github REST API
[doc](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/commits/statuses?apiVersion=2022-11-28#list-commit-statuses-for-a-reference ):
1. The `Drone CI` that can create some commit status by
[API](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/commits/statuses?apiVersion=2022-11-28#create-a-commit-status )
is enabled in `go-gitea/gitea`. So I tried to call the API to get a
commit status list of a PR which is commited to upstream
repo(`go-gitea/gitea`). As a result, the API returned a array of commit
status.
2. Then I tried to call the API to get commit status list of the
reference which of the `SHA` is the same as step 1 in the repo which is
forked from `go-gitea/gitea`. But I got a empty array.
So, I believe it thatοΌ
1. The commit status is not shared between upstream repo and forked
repo.
2. The coomit status is bound to a repo that performs actions. (Gitea's
logic is the same)
### Cause
During debugging, I found it that commit status are not stored in the DB
as expected.
So, I located the following code:
8cadd51bf2/services/actions/commit_status.go (L18-L26)https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/223939339-dadf539c-1fdd-40c4-96e9-2e4fa733f531.png )
### Other
In this PR, I also fix the problem of missing icon which represents
running in PRs list.
2023-03-13 16:05:19 -05:00
cbc9a0fe47
Avoid too long names for actions ( #23162 )
...
The name of the job or step comes from the workflow file, while the name
of the runner comes from its registration. If the strings used for these
names are too long, they could cause db issues.
2023-02-28 18:20:36 +08:00
edf98a2dc3
Require approval to run actions for fork pull request ( #22803 )
...
Currently, Gitea will run actions automatically which are triggered by
fork pull request. It's a security risk, people can create a PR and
modify the workflow yamls to execute a malicious script.
So we should require approval for first-time contributors, which is the
default strategy of a public repo on GitHub, see [Approving workflow
runs from public
forks](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/managing-workflow-runs/approving-workflow-runs-from-public-forks ).
Current strategy:
- don't need approval if it's not a fork PR;
- always need approval if the user is restricted;
- don't need approval if the user can write;
- don't need approval if the user has been approved before;
- otherwise, need approval.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/217207121-badf50a8-826c-4425-bef1-d82d1979bc81.mov
GitHub has an option for that, you can see that at
`/<owner>/<repo>/settings/actions`, and we can support that later.
<img width="835" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/217199990-2967e68b-e693-4e59-8186-ab33a1314a16.png ">
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-24 15:58:49 +08:00
707ecec715
Fix ref to trigger Actions ( #22679 )
...
If triggered by PR, the ref should be `pull/<index>/head` instead of
`repo.DefaultBranch`.
And improve UI:
<img width="493" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/215731280-312564f2-2450-45d0-b986-1accb0670976.png ">
Related to #21937 .
2023-01-31 22:45:25 +00:00
4011821c94
Implement actions ( #21937 )
...
Close #13539 .
Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others.
Related projects:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner
### Summary
The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions",
an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been
merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note
that:
- It is disabled by default;
- It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently;
- It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently;
- Breaking changes may be made before it's stable.
**Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design
ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this
PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**.
### β οΈ Breaking
`gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the
name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it.
### Some important reviews
- What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954
- Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592
- Why DBFS?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178
- Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103
- Why there's no permission control for actions?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868
### What it looks like
<details>
#### Manage runners
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png ">
#### List runs
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png ">
#### View logs
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png ">
</details>
### How to try it
<details>
#### 1. Start Gitea
Clone this branch and [install from
source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source ).
Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions:
```ini
[actions]
ENABLED = true
```
Start it.
If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png ">
#### 2. Start runner
Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner ), and follow
the
[README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md )
to start it.
If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png ">
#### 3. Enable actions for a repo
Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox
in settings and submit.
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png ">
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png ">
If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions":
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png ">
#### 4. Upload workflow files
Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can
follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart )
of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions
in most cases, you can use the same demo:
```yaml
name: GitHub Actions Demo
run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions π
on: [push]
jobs:
Explore-GitHub-Actions:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- run: echo "π The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event."
- run: echo "π§ This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!"
- run: echo "π The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}."
- name: Check out repository code
uses: actions/checkout@v3
- run: echo "π‘ The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner."
- run: echo "π₯οΈ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner."
- name: List files in the repository
run: |
ls ${{ github.workspace }}
- run: echo "π This job's status is ${{ job.status }}."
```
If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png ">
#### 5. Check the logs of jobs
Click a run and you'll see the logs:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png ">
#### 6. Go on
You can try more examples in [the
documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions )
of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs.
Come on, PRs are welcome.
</details>
See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea
Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/ )
---------
Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-31 09:45:19 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
Jason Song
sillyguodong
