This removes parsing support for selectors such as :nth-child(-n-6). According
to the CSS spec this isn't valid anyway (confirmed by testing it in Chromium).
As a result there's no point in supporting it in any way.
When lexing multi-line strings everything used to work fine as long as the input
were to be read as a whole. However, when using an IO instance all hell would
break loose. Due to the lexer reading IO instances on a per line basis,
sometimes Ragel would end up setting "ts" to NULL. For example, the following
input would break the lexer:
<foo class="\nbar" />
Due to the input being read per line, the following data would be sent to the
lexer:
<foo class="\n
bar" />
This would result in different (or NULL) pointers being used for building a
string, in turn resulting in memory allocation errors.
To work around this the string lexing setup has been broken into separate
machines for single and double quoted strings. The tokens used have also been
changed so that instead of just "T_STRING" there are now the following tokens:
* T_STRING_SQUOTE
* T_STRING_DQUOTE
* T_STRING_BODY
A string can have multiple T_STRING_BODY tokens (= multi-line strings, only the
case for IO inputs). These strings are stitched back together by the parser.
This fixes#58.
Processing of this axis along with a predicate wouldn't quite work out. Even if
the predicate returned false the node would still be matched (which should not
be the case).
Previously input such as "x > y" would result in the following token sequences:
T_IDENT, T_CHILD, T_IDENT
This commit changes this to the following:
T_IDENT, T_SPACE, T_CHILD, T_IDENT
This allows the parser to use T_SPACE as a terminal token, this in turn prevents
around 16 shift/reduce conflicts from arising.
This does mean that input such as " > y" or " x > y" is now invalid. This
however can be solved by simply _not_ adding leading/trailing whitespace to CSS
queries.
The new setup will not involve a separate transformation stage, instead the CSS
parser will directly emit an XPath AST. This reduces the overhead needed for
parsing/evaluating CSS selectors while also simplifying the code. The downside
is that I basically have to re-write 80% of the parser.
This uses stricter (and more correct) rules in both the lexer and the parser.
The resulting AST has also received a small rework to make it more compact and
less confusing.
Yorick Peterse