Add package registry architecture overview (#23445)
As announced in #22810 I added a readme file to help understanding how the package registry archictecture works and how the go packages are related.
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									8421b8264f
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						8570593d55
					
				| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
 | 
			
		|||
# Gitea Package Registry
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
This document gives a brief overview how the package registry is organized in code.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Structure
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
The package registry code is divided into multiple modules to split the functionality and make code reuse possible.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
| Module | Description |
 | 
			
		||||
| - | - |
 | 
			
		||||
| `models/packages` | Common methods and models used by all registry types |
 | 
			
		||||
| `models/packages/<type>` | Methods used by specific registry type. There should be no need to use type specific models. |
 | 
			
		||||
| `modules/packages` | Common methods and types used by multiple registry types |
 | 
			
		||||
| `modules/packages/<type>` | Registry type specific methods and types (e.g. metadata extraction of package files) |
 | 
			
		||||
| `routers/api/packages` | Route definitions for all registry types |
 | 
			
		||||
| `routers/api/packages/<type>` | Route implementation for a specific registry type |
 | 
			
		||||
| `services/packages` | Helper methods used by registry types to handle common tasks like package creation and deletion in `routers` |
 | 
			
		||||
| `services/packages/<type>` | Registry type specific methods used by `routers` and `services` |
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Models
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Every package registry implementation uses the same underlaying models:
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
| Model | Description |
 | 
			
		||||
| - | - |
 | 
			
		||||
| `Package` | The root of a package providing values fixed for every version (e.g. the package name) |
 | 
			
		||||
| `PackageVersion` | A version of a package containing metadata (e.g. the package description) |
 | 
			
		||||
| `PackageFile` | A file of a package describing its content (e.g. file name) |
 | 
			
		||||
| `PackageBlob` | The content of a file (may be shared by multiple files) |
 | 
			
		||||
| `PackageProperty` | Additional properties attached to `Package`, `PackageVersion` or `PackageFile` (e.g. used if metadata is needed for routing) |
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
The following diagram shows the relationship between the models:
 | 
			
		||||
```
 | 
			
		||||
Package <1---*> PackageVersion <1---*> PackageFile <*---1> PackageBlob
 | 
			
		||||
```
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Adding a new package registry type
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Before adding a new package registry type have a look at the existing implementation to get an impression of how it could work.
 | 
			
		||||
Most registry types offer endpoints to retrieve the metadata, upload and download package files.
 | 
			
		||||
The upload endpoint is often the heavy part because it must validate the uploaded blob, extract metadata and create the models.
 | 
			
		||||
The methods to validate and extract the metadata should be added in the `modules/packages/<type>` package.
 | 
			
		||||
If the upload is valid the methods in `services/packages` allow to store the upload and create the corresponding models.
 | 
			
		||||
It depends if the registry type allows multiple files per package version which method should be called:
 | 
			
		||||
- `CreatePackageAndAddFile`: error if package version already exists
 | 
			
		||||
- `CreatePackageOrAddFileToExisting`: error if file already exists
 | 
			
		||||
- `AddFileToExistingPackage`: error if package version does not exist or file already exists
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
`services/packages` also contains helper methods to download a file or to remove a package version.
 | 
			
		||||
There are no helper methods for metadata endpoints because they are very type specific.
 | 
			
		||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue