Backport #28626 by @hakito
Make it clear that this value is just a default value and that every
artifact can have it's own value.
Co-authored-by: Gerd Katzenbeisser <hakito@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #28587, the only conflict is the test file.
The CORS code has been unmaintained for long time, and the behavior is
not correct.
This PR tries to improve it. The key point is written as comment in
code. And add more tests.
Fix#28515Fix#27642Fix#17098
Backport #28593 by @lunny
This reverts commit b35d3fddfac389a7be401a63b4e1283dd74af681.
This is totally wrong. I think `Update join` hasn't been supported well
by xorm.
I just revert the PR and will try to send another one.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Backport #28588 by @yardenshoham
It included the hours, minutes, and seconds. By removing these, the date
renders correctly.
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Backport #28583 by @morphelinho
Follow #28184
Follow #28515
Fix problem with 405 method not allowed for CORS wrt OIDC
Co-authored-by: morphelinho <morphelinho@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #28576 by wxiaoguang
Regression of #28454 . Now the string is escaped HTML, so it doesn't
need `| Safe`.
Fix#28575
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #28555 by @fuxiaohei
Related to https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28279
When merging artifact chunks, it lists chunks from storage. When storage
is minio, chunk's path contains `MINIO_BASE_PATH` that makes merging
break.
<del>So trim the `MINIO_BASE_PATH` when handle chunks.</del>
Update the chunk file's basename to retain necessary information. It
ensures that the directory in the chunk's path remains unaffected.
Co-authored-by: FuXiaoHei <fuxiaohei@vip.qq.com>
Backport #28552 by @6543
can we please PLEAS PLEASE only use raw SQL statements if it is relay
needed!!!
source is https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/28544 (before
refactoring)
Co-authored-by: 6543 <m.huber@kithara.com>
Backport #28520 by @framitdavid
There is an accessibility issue in the interface when attempting to
delete a repository. When I click on "Delete repository," a dialog box
appears, requiring confirmation to proceed with the repository deletion.
However, when I press the "Repo name" label, the wrong input field gains
focus. The focused field is located behind the dialog and is intended
for renaming the repository.
I am submitting these pull requests to ensure that the correct input
field is focused when the user clicks on the label. This change will
also facilitate the writing of tests using Playwright or Testing Library
to retrieve elements based on roles. This PR will also improve
acessibility of this area.
Co-authored-by: David Øvrelid <46874830+framitdavid@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #28491 by @appleboy
- Modify the `Password` field in `CreateUserOption` struct to remove the
`Required` tag
- Update the `v1_json.tmpl` template to include the `email` field and
remove the `password` field
Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
Backport #28487 by @earl-warren
- When a repository is orphaned and has objects stored in any of the
storages such as repository avatar or attachments the delete function
would error, because the storage module wasn't initalized.
- Add code to initialize the storage module.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1954
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <109468362+earl-warren@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Backport #28441 by wxiaoguang
Fix#28319
It only polyfills if there is no "SubmitEvent" class, so it has no side
effect for most users.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #28392 by @nekrondev
Windows-based shells will add a CRLF when piping the token into
ssh-keygen command resulting in
verification error. This resolves#21527.
Co-authored-by: nekrondev <heiko@noordsee.de>
Co-authored-by: Heiko Besemann <heiko.besemann@qbeyond.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #28457 by @KN4CK3R
Recently Docker started to use the optional `POST /v2/token` endpoint
which should respond with a `404 Not Found` status code instead of the
current `405 Method Not Allowed`.
> Note: Not all token servers implement oauth2. If the request to the
endpoint returns 404 using the HTTP POST method, refer to Token
Documentation for using the HTTP GET method supported by all token
servers.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Backport #28428 by @KN4CK3R
There could be a nil pointer exception if the file is not found because
that specific error is suppressed but not handled.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Backport #28390 by @jackHay22
## Changes
- Add deprecation warning to `Token` and `AccessToken` authentication
methods in swagger.
- Add deprecation warning header to API response. Example:
```
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
...
Warning: token and access_token API authentication is deprecated
...
```
- Add setting `DISABLE_QUERY_AUTH_TOKEN` to reject query string auth
tokens entirely. Default is `false`
## Next steps
- `DISABLE_QUERY_AUTH_TOKEN` should be true in a subsequent release and
the methods should be removed in swagger
- `DISABLE_QUERY_AUTH_TOKEN` should be removed and the implementation of
the auth methods in question should be removed
## Open questions
- Should there be further changes to the swagger documentation?
Deprecation is not yet supported for security definitions (coming in
[OpenAPI Spec version
3.2.0](https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/issues/2506))
- Should the API router logger sanitize urls that use `token` or
`access_token`? (This is obviously an insufficient solution on its own)
Co-authored-by: Jack Hay <jack@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Backport #28409 by @earl-warren
- Currently there's code to recover gracefully from panics that happen
within the execution of cron tasks. However this recover code wasn't
being run, because `RunWithShutdownContext` also contains code to
recover from any panic and then gracefully shutdown Forgejo. Because
`RunWithShutdownContext` registers that code as last, that would get run
first which in this case is not behavior that we want.
- Move the recover code to inside the function, so that is run first
before `RunWithShutdownContext`'s recover code (which is now a noop).
Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1910
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <109468362+earl-warren@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Backport #28422 by wxiaoguang
1. Do not sort the "checks" slice again and again when "Register", it
just wastes CPU when the Gitea instance runs
2. If a check doesn't exist, tell the end user
3. Add some tests
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #28302 by @yp05327
Close#28287
## How to test it in local
convert Makefile L34 into:
```
cd .tmp/upstream-docs && git clean -f && git reset --hard && git fetch origin pull/28302/head:pr28302 && git switch pr28302
```
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Fix#28056
Backport #28361
This PR will check whether the repo has zero branch when pushing a
branch. If that, it means this repository hasn't been synced.
The reason caused that is after user upgrade from v1.20 -> v1.21, he
just push branches without visit the repository user interface. Because
all repositories routers will check whether a branches sync is necessary
but push has not such check.
For every repository, it has two states, synced or not synced. If there
is zero branch for a repository, then it will be assumed as non-sync
state. Otherwise, it's synced state. So if we think it's synced, we just
need to update branch/insert new branch. Otherwise do a full sync. So
that, for every push, there will be almost no extra load added. It's
high performance than yours.
For the implementation, we in fact will try to update the branch first,
if updated success with affect records > 0, then all are done. Because
that means the branch has been in the database. If no record is
affected, that means the branch does not exist in database. So there are
two possibilities. One is this is a new branch, then we just need to
insert the record. Another is the branches haven't been synced, then we
need to sync all the branches into database.
Backport #28348 by @AdamMajer
nogogit GetBranchNames() lists branches sorted in reverse commit date
order. On the other hand the gogit implementation doesn't apply any
ordering resulting in unpredictable behaviour. In my case, the unit
tests requiring particular order fail
repo_branch_test.go:24:
Error Trace:
./gitea/modules/git/repo_branch_test.go:24
Error: elements differ
extra elements in list A:
([]interface {}) (len=1) {
(string) (len=6) "master"
}
extra elements in list B:
([]interface {}) (len=1) {
(string) (len=7) "branch1"
}
listA:
([]string) (len=2) {
(string) (len=6) "master",
(string) (len=7) "branch2"
}
listB:
([]string) (len=2) {
(string) (len=7) "branch1",
(string) (len=7) "branch2"
}
Test: TestRepository_GetBranches
To fix this, we sort branches based on their commit date in gogit
implementation.
Fixes: #28318
Co-authored-by: Adam Majer <amajer@suse.de>
Backport #28314 by @yp05327
Fix#28264
`DataAsync()` will be called twice.
Caused by https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/27958.
I'm sorry, I didn't completely remove all unnecessary codes.
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Backport #28373 by @capvor
In the documents, the `[attachment] MAX_SIZE` default value should be 4.
Reference the source code `modules/setting/attachment.go` line 29.
Co-authored-by: capvor <capvor@sina.com>
Giteabot
wxiaoguang
Lunny Xiao
techknowlogick